The Electric Hot Rod?
By Jim Beacon
January 10, 2009Holding the future hostage to an outdated mindset —
It’s very frustrating. There’s a lot of media attention being given to the very real and exciting electric cars now finally appearing on the consumer market and that’s a good thing. But every time I see an article or a news story about an electric car somebody always starts going on about how slow the electric car will be compared to what we drive today.
It seems people always insist on comparing the performance of each new electric vehicle that comes along to the old V-8 gas-guzzling race track ‘performance standards’ set back in the cheap gas heyday of the 1960s and early 1970s.
This is an irrational, regressive and even dangerous comparison to make. The idea that an electric car really isn’t going to be worth much until it performs like the gasoline vehicles we spent 100 years developing and perfecting is last-century thinking at its worst. I mean, even if they could make one with that kind of so-called ‘performance’ that did not cost $60,000 or more, why is that a goal we should even be striving for these days?
Now don’t mistake me for a car-hating freak. I *love* my 1968 Mustang with its rumbling 351 V-8 engine. But I only drive it now on the rarest of occasions. It’s an antique from a bygone era and as nostalgic as I feel about it, I do NOT want the electric car I’ll be buying someday to be modeled after it, or cater to the mindset that created it in the first place. That was then. This is now. Let’s move on.
We are in a new century, and an extra 4 billion people have come on board since the muscle car days when those zero-to-sixty ‘performance standards’ were programmed into everyone’s head as somehow the way cars are supposed to be. But as a society we now need to adopt a new mindset for the new world situation. Actually, we won’t really have a choice about that — a new mindset will be thrust upon us whether we want to adopt it or not. There are 7 billion people now, but in just ten more years there will be 8 billion people living here (!) It won’t matter what kind of fuel we are using in our personal vehicles — strict conservation of ALL resources (even manufactured ones like electricity and hydrogen) will be mandatory.
The electricity which electric cars “burn” is not free in terms of cost or consequences to our world. It does not appear by magic out of the wall outlets in our homes. It must be generated somehow and so it remains a valuable resource — something we need to treat with respect and a conscious attitude of conservation.
Even solar, wind and water-generated electricity carry some cost in terms of resources used to create power. You have to consume a lot of aluminum, steel, plastics, chemicals, electronics and other materials — plus use energy — in order to manufacture, ship and install the devices to capture those ‘free’ alternative energy sources. Although that cost is far more reasonable that what we have been paying to burn gasoline, the fact remains that how we use any resources must now be considered far more carefully and prudently than we have in the past. All of the casual, wasteful practices we acquired during the last century will have to be put away, including the purely psychological need for excessive speed in our personal vehicles.
Our new ‘performance standard’ must be based on something more responsible than how fast a car can go from zero to sixty and what its top cruising speed is. I just don’t see how the personal vehicles for all of our billions can deliver a truly acceptable resource consumption curve at top speeds much more than 60 mph. People are just going to have to accept this sort of limitation and social responsibility as the price of living in an overpopulated world. But seriously… if you stop and think about it without emotion… 60 miles per hour is plenty fast enough for a personal vehicle.
Sure, today the idea of driving “only” 60 mph seems terribly sluggish and even dangerously impractical on our absurdly fast-driving super highways — but that is only because everyone else on the road is going so fast. If everyone were also doing 60 mph, then that speed would soon feel as ‘natural’ to us as it does to go blasting down the road at 80 or 90 mph today.
In fact, why do we have to wait until we’re all driving electric cars to readjust our ‘performance standard’ to a more responsible level of speed and fuel consumption?
Putting into effect a worldwide agreement to limit driving speeds to 60 mph would not only save tremendous amounts of crude oil, but would cut way back on greenhouse gas emissions and also save quite a few lives. And those are benefits that would not take years or decades to achieve like so many other green initiatives and proposals — those benefits could be achieved tomorrow with the stroke of a few pens. It would not require us to change our existing vehicles or spend billions on any mega-projects. All we need to do is just back off on the old gas pedal a little bit. How hard is that?
— Jim Beacon
Filed Under: Conservation, Electric Cars, Hybrid Cars, The Green Mindset, The Politics of Green, Transportation


Jack Quaker :
February 12th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Here’s my three-part dream… and an All-American solution at that.
One, offer me some credit (and not at those usury rates that most banks demand).
Two, I’ll go to my local Chevy dealer and buy the 100 % electric plug-in Volt auto (when its available).
Three, offer me truly affordable solar panels and provide a competent installer (that I can afford, too) so I can utilize solar energy to recharge my Volt every evening.
What a beautiful, carbon-free world it would be.
Jim Beacon :
February 17th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Jack,
A beautiful plan, but sadly not carbon free because right now in the U.S. we generate 49% of our electricity by burning coal (which puts more carbon into the atmosphere than anything else we do) and another 21% by burning natural gas (puts out half as much CO2 as coal, but still a lot). So, with 70% of our electricity coming from power plants that put out millions of tons of CO2 every day, driving any plug-in electric car right now would not be carbon free.
Your idea of using solar panels on your roof to charge your Volt might work for you individually, but is not really practical for most people as you would need a very large system to provide enough power to do it. Not only would that be very expensive (even with government subsidies) but most people simply do not have the large amount of square footage of good solar-exposure open space necessary in their homes/apartments to place such a system.
This is why I advocate building a lot more nuclear power plants (the best green alternative power source there is, although improperly handled it is obviously very dangerous and so the idea scares the heck out of me). As much as I love solar, wind and water alternatives, there is no other way to dramatically and quickly reduce carbon emissions AND quickly provide all the extra electricity that all these electric cars will need to run on. Building out that much wind and solar generating capacity simply cannot be done in only 10 to 15 years. We should do as much of that as we possibly can, but it’s time for the green movement to grow up and accept the unpleasant fact that if we *really* want to make a big cut in our carbon emissions quickly then we simply have to drink the nasty medicine and build more nuke plants.
Even so, the Chevy Volt is the still best alternative vehicle right now because when its battery runs low, it uses its small gasoline engine to spin a generator which provides more on-board electricity to the electric motor to drive the wheels. Since the gasoline engine does not have to drive the wheels directly, it only has to run at a single constant speed and thus can be made extremely efficient and low-emission. Until we can get coal out of the electrical generating picture, the Volt’s approach will be the lowest total-emission method of powering an electric car.
The sad truth is that other types of hybrids — where a larger gasoline motor turns on and drives the wheels directly when the battery runs low — provide NO net reduction in CO2 emissions compared to driving a regular 30-mpg gasoline vehicle. Sorry, Honda and all you Prius fans, but that’s the simple truth as long as we are generating 70% of our household electricity with coal and natural gas.
You can read more about my thoughts on our electric power generating dilemma at
http://www.thegreenerhome.com/eblog/green-hype-part-1-natural-gas/